|
| |
|
The Institutional Challenge to
Train and Maintain Physician Scientists: |
 |
The very best physician scientists are required to
generate and transmit new knowledge to fellow scientists, clinicians and
trainees. Physician scientists need to have an environment that rewards
their motivation, their ability to unravel the mysteries of pathobiology,
and that fosters innovative and transformative research. High-quality
programs are required to provide the unique training that Pathology and
Laboratory Medicine offers to study, understand, diagnose, treat and prevent
human disease. A stimulating intellectual environment with state-of-the-art
resources and time dedicated to research are needed to launch physician
scientist careers and support their productive growth, especially in the
early stages of their careers. Universities, teaching hospitals, affiliated
research institutes, granting agencies (both private and government), and
industrial partners need to actively support these academic initiatives and
create capacity to train physician scientists and to support their mentors.
All will benefit from having a strong core of physician scientists in the
biomedical research and clinical community. It is indeed this group of
investigators who form an essential component to achieve the current NIH
goal of transforming medicine from curative to preventative.
Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine across the globe require
the very best faculty to successfully meet the challenges of the medicine
that is practiced today and that will be practiced tomorrow. Universities,
teaching hospitals, and research institutes need to develop training
programs to train individuals along three interdependent pathways which
support the three pillars of academic medicine - research, teaching, and
clinical care:
Research: Excellent productive investigators need to be trained to acquire a
knowledge base and the technical expertise to explore mechanisms of disease
and translate basic knowledge to clinically useful information to diagnose,
treat, predict prognosis, and prevent disease.
Teaching: Innovative teachers require the training to be able to link
teaching to research and to state-of-the-art knowledge and technology, and
to be able to carry out research in education.
Clinical care: Subspecialty clinicians need to be trained to produce
consultants who are exceptional diagnosticians and who continuously push the
limits of diagnosis through innovative use of modern biological concepts and
state-of-the-art technology.
These three pathways are all important and since pathology sits at the cross
roads of basic science and clinical medicine, Departments of Pathology are
excellent training environments for physician scientists. As the practice of
modern academic medicine becomes more complex, it is not practical to demand
in-depth expertise in all the three pillars of academic laboratory medicine
- research, teaching, and clinical care. A logical approach in today's
biomedical world is to develop excellence in one or two of the three
pathways and to be competent in the others.
Thus training programs need to be adjusted to provide the very best
opportunities to train future faculty along the excellent/competent
paradigm. Departments would do well to adjust their academic resources to
provide their academic faculty with career development and advancement that
focus on these pathways, always demanding that innovation, new knowledge,
and international recognition be the hallmark of excellence for all the
three pillars of academic laboratory medicine.
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|